Yesterday, after finishing qualifying students on the range, I decided to purchase another pistol. I paid for the gun, completed the paperwork, and left the store without the gun.
Since I'm in California, I have to wait ten days before I can pick it up. They call it a "cooling off period". As I understand it, the ten days is to allow me to "cool off" in case I'm purchasing the gun with an intention to use it for some violent act.
The problem with that idea is pretty simple when you consider that I was legally carrying a gun when I bought the new one. In fact, I had to provide my California CCW permit in order to avoid having to take the little test required for what California calls a "Firearms Safety Certificate".
Since California required me to provide my CCW permit, the state knows that I already have guns and that I actually carry one on my person in public. This leads me to an inescapable conclusion. State leaders are too stupid to understand this basic truth. If I wanted to use a gun for some criminal act, I could use the gun I was carrying. I wouldn't need the new one.
So, tell me again... why am I being forced to wait ten days?
In the first half, attorney Sean Maloney from Second Call Defense joins me to explain the lessons gun owners can learn from what happened to Kyle Rittenhouse.
In the second half, I discuss a home invasion case from Oceanside California in which the homeowner successfully defended himself.
BREAKING: California Gun Case Turned Upside Down – New 9th Circuit Brief.
BREAKING: California Gun Case Turned Upside Down – New 9th Circuit Brief
Second Amendment Foundation just filed a 47-page constitutional INDICTMENT exposing Ninth Circuit's 132-year gun rights sabotage. The evidence is DEVASTATING.
The Statistics:
• 100% reversal rate of Second Amendment victories (not 90%, not 95% - ONE HUNDRED PERCENT)
• Only 1 gun rights win survived in 132 years (California missed filing deadline)
• En banc review granted in 48 HOURS for gun cases vs 8 MONTHS for other constitutional issues
• Ninth Circuit reversed by Supreme Court at 90% rate on 2A cases
• Affects 65 MILLION Americans across 9 states
What They're Alleging:
Coordination between judges and anti-gun state governments. Financial warfare bankrupting gun rights groups ($15M CA spending vs $5M SAF total budget). Public statements by judges admitting they'll "interpret...