I think the ban on AR15s in some states is not long for this world. Here is a quote from Justice Thomas' statement today:
"The Seventh Circuit’s decision illustrates why this Court must provide more guidance on which weapons the Second Amendment covers. By contorting what little guidance our precedents provide, the Seventh Circuit concluded that the Second Amendment does not protect “militaristic” weapons. It then tautologically defined “militaristic” weapons as those “that may be reserved for military use.”
The Seventh Circuit’s contrived “non-militaristic” limitation on the Arms protected by the Second Amendment seems unmoored from both text and history. And, even on its own terms, the Seventh Circuit’s application of its definition is nonsensical. (“The AR–15 is a civilian, not military, weapon. No army in the world uses a service rifle that is only semiautomatic”).
In my view, Illinois’ ban is “highly suspect because it broadly prohibits common semiautomatic firearms used for lawful purposes.” It is difficult to see how the Seventh Circuit could have concluded that the most widely owned semiautomatic rifles are not “Arms” protected by the Second Amendment."
In the first half, attorney Sean Maloney from Second Call Defense joins me to explain the lessons gun owners can learn from what happened to Kyle Rittenhouse.
In the second half, I discuss a home invasion case from Oceanside California in which the homeowner successfully defended himself.
Trump Goes NUCLEAR over Magazine Bans.
Jun 10, 2026
Gun owners have been living with magazine bans for years—but what if one of the most accepted forms of gun control is finally being challenged? In this video, we break down the Trump DOJ's lawsuit against Colorado's 15-round magazine ban and why this fight is much bigger than Colorado itself. For years, politicians have argued that standard-capacity magazines are somehow excessive, but millions of Americans own firearms designed around common magazines.
We'll discuss how magazine restrictions became normalized, why many gun owners were forced to accept reduced-capacity firearms, and the real-world self-defense implications of magazine limits. We also examine the legal arguments being used against Colorado, how the Bruen decision changed the landscape, and why this case could impact magazine bans across the country.
