I'm not sure it will withstand a court challenge, but it is interesting.
If I understand it correctly, a property owner (such as a business) may prohibit the carry of firearms by those who can lawfully carry. However, that business owner is legally responsible for the safety of the patron who is forced to leave the gun behind when entering the business. If the patron is injured or killed as a result of being disarmed, the business owner can be held responsible in civil court.
https://www.breitbart.com/2nd-amendment/2024/02/27/georgia-bill-makes-property-owners-liable-for-injuries-in-gun-free-zones/
In the first half, attorney Sean Maloney from Second Call Defense joins me to explain the lessons gun owners can learn from what happened to Kyle Rittenhouse.
In the second half, I discuss a home invasion case from Oceanside California in which the homeowner successfully defended himself.
