I'm not sure it will withstand a court challenge, but it is interesting.
If I understand it correctly, a property owner (such as a business) may prohibit the carry of firearms by those who can lawfully carry. However, that business owner is legally responsible for the safety of the patron who is forced to leave the gun behind when entering the business. If the patron is injured or killed as a result of being disarmed, the business owner can be held responsible in civil court.
https://www.breitbart.com/2nd-amendment/2024/02/27/georgia-bill-makes-property-owners-liable-for-injuries-in-gun-free-zones/
In the first half, attorney Sean Maloney from Second Call Defense joins me to explain the lessons gun owners can learn from what happened to Kyle Rittenhouse.
In the second half, I discuss a home invasion case from Oceanside California in which the homeowner successfully defended himself.
https://x.com/i/status/1930180307073777697
RFK Jr. promises to stop the World Economic Forum.
"Their scheme, which they call the Great Reset, will drain whatever's left in your bank account and strip mine the beleaguered middle class of its remaining equity."
"During Covid, the WEF actually dictated the lockdowns that shifted $4 trillion upward to this new oligarchy of corporate billionaires.
The bankers, the investment houses, scooped up our homes, advertising that you will own nothing and be happy."
"They have a plan, but my plan is to stop them."
https://x.com/i/status/1929910679835738453
Defund the UN
🤬They just declared war on free speech. UN Secretary-General António Guterres is talking about X and other platforms.💩
