I'm not sure it will withstand a court challenge, but it is interesting.
If I understand it correctly, a property owner (such as a business) may prohibit the carry of firearms by those who can lawfully carry. However, that business owner is legally responsible for the safety of the patron who is forced to leave the gun behind when entering the business. If the patron is injured or killed as a result of being disarmed, the business owner can be held responsible in civil court.
https://www.breitbart.com/2nd-amendment/2024/02/27/georgia-bill-makes-property-owners-liable-for-injuries-in-gun-free-zones/
This is the video Grok Imagine created from a still photo of a duck hunting trip.
In the first half, attorney Sean Maloney from Second Call Defense joins me to explain the lessons gun owners can learn from what happened to Kyle Rittenhouse.
In the second half, I discuss a home invasion case from Oceanside California in which the homeowner successfully defended himself.
California Gun Owners' Only Hope... Chad Bianco For Governor.
Dec 4, 2025
In this episode, the Turner’s Outdoorsman crew sits down with Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco to discuss the current state of California for gun owners and outdoor enthusiasts. Sheriff Bianco, who is currently running for California Governor, shares insight into his background and explains how his policies align with the interests of firearm owners, hunters, and anglers across the state.
If you enjoyed the episode, be sure to follow, like, subscribe, leave a review, and share it with your community.
California Knife Laws and Your Right to Self-Defense
https://gunguy.tv/2025/12/04/clearing-the-myths-california-knife-laws-and-your-right-to-self-defense/
