The other day I asked if I should go back to carrying this 45. I got some great answers in the comments. Here are my thoughts.
When I carried this gun it was for work. Things have changed. I'm retired. I haven't got a job anymore and I don't need to deal with violent people all day long. Obviously, I'm still running Practical Defense Systems where I teach, I manage our rental properties, and I make videos for GunGuyTV. None of which puts me in harm’s way on a daily basis. My needs have changed.
Back in the day, I needed a big gun because I was dealing with bad people for a living. I don't do that anymore. I also avoid places where bad people congregate. So, I don't really need to carry a big gun for that either.
I love the old Colt and I take it to the range a lot. It's an old friend. If I ever again need to be in harm's way, I'll take it with me in a heartbeat. But, not today or even most days. I carry my M&P Shield or my Taurus Model 85 most of the time.
Times have changed. My needs have changed. The tools have changed. I guess one size doesn't fit all.
In the first half, attorney Sean Maloney from Second Call Defense joins me to explain the lessons gun owners can learn from what happened to Kyle Rittenhouse.
In the second half, I discuss a home invasion case from Oceanside California in which the homeowner successfully defended himself.
BREAKING: California Gun Case Turned Upside Down – New 9th Circuit Brief.
BREAKING: California Gun Case Turned Upside Down – New 9th Circuit Brief
Second Amendment Foundation just filed a 47-page constitutional INDICTMENT exposing Ninth Circuit's 132-year gun rights sabotage. The evidence is DEVASTATING.
The Statistics:
• 100% reversal rate of Second Amendment victories (not 90%, not 95% - ONE HUNDRED PERCENT)
• Only 1 gun rights win survived in 132 years (California missed filing deadline)
• En banc review granted in 48 HOURS for gun cases vs 8 MONTHS for other constitutional issues
• Ninth Circuit reversed by Supreme Court at 90% rate on 2A cases
• Affects 65 MILLION Americans across 9 states
What They're Alleging:
Coordination between judges and anti-gun state governments. Financial warfare bankrupting gun rights groups ($15M CA spending vs $5M SAF total budget). Public statements by judges admitting they'll "interpret...