I watched several new reports addressing the SCOTUS decision in limiting the EPA's power. All of them have speculated that this is a landmark decision that will likely have a ripple effect across the entire federal executive branch. Having read the decision this morning, I'm of the opinion that this decision will be used to curtail the unconstitutional power of federal regulatory agencies when they attempt to make laws that have far reaching consequences. This will blunt the effect of a president's executive orders to a degree.
I suggest that you keep an eye on the analysis. I'm hoping that John Turley might appear on FOX or some other news channel to talk about it. He generally hits the nail on the head. If I'm right, we might see this case used in arguments against the ATF's overreach, in some future court case.
Grok made the Mariachi Band. The others we deported. 😁
In the first half, attorney Sean Maloney from Second Call Defense joins me to explain the lessons gun owners can learn from what happened to Kyle Rittenhouse.
In the second half, I discuss a home invasion case from Oceanside California in which the homeowner successfully defended himself.
BREAKING: California Gun Case Turned Upside Down – New 9th Circuit Brief.
BREAKING: California Gun Case Turned Upside Down – New 9th Circuit Brief
Second Amendment Foundation just filed a 47-page constitutional INDICTMENT exposing Ninth Circuit's 132-year gun rights sabotage. The evidence is DEVASTATING.
The Statistics:
• 100% reversal rate of Second Amendment victories (not 90%, not 95% - ONE HUNDRED PERCENT)
• Only 1 gun rights win survived in 132 years (California missed filing deadline)
• En banc review granted in 48 HOURS for gun cases vs 8 MONTHS for other constitutional issues
• Ninth Circuit reversed by Supreme Court at 90% rate on 2A cases
• Affects 65 MILLION Americans across 9 states
What They're Alleging:
Coordination between judges and anti-gun state governments. Financial warfare bankrupting gun rights groups ($15M CA spending vs $5M SAF total budget). Public statements by judges admitting they'll "interpret...
