Hmm. How can a government refuse to pay a judgement against it? I understand the right to appeal a judgement, but at some point you must pay if you exhaust all appeals. Unless they intend to appeal the decision, their refusal to pay the bill is criminal in and of itself.
I have read story after story of law abiding gun owners being railroaded by their local and state governments. This story isn't about gun rights. Still, the acts of government officials ignoring the courts is a VERY disturbing trend. It disregards the checks and balances put in place by our country's founders in the Constitution.
Grok made the Mariachi Band. The others we deported. 😁
In the first half, attorney Sean Maloney from Second Call Defense joins me to explain the lessons gun owners can learn from what happened to Kyle Rittenhouse.
In the second half, I discuss a home invasion case from Oceanside California in which the homeowner successfully defended himself.
BREAKING: California Gun Case Turned Upside Down – New 9th Circuit Brief.
BREAKING: California Gun Case Turned Upside Down – New 9th Circuit Brief
Second Amendment Foundation just filed a 47-page constitutional INDICTMENT exposing Ninth Circuit's 132-year gun rights sabotage. The evidence is DEVASTATING.
The Statistics:
• 100% reversal rate of Second Amendment victories (not 90%, not 95% - ONE HUNDRED PERCENT)
• Only 1 gun rights win survived in 132 years (California missed filing deadline)
• En banc review granted in 48 HOURS for gun cases vs 8 MONTHS for other constitutional issues
• Ninth Circuit reversed by Supreme Court at 90% rate on 2A cases
• Affects 65 MILLION Americans across 9 states
What They're Alleging:
Coordination between judges and anti-gun state governments. Financial warfare bankrupting gun rights groups ($15M CA spending vs $5M SAF total budget). Public statements by judges admitting they'll "interpret...
